Whatley et al v. Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center
| Pacita Whatley, Reverand Dr. Samuel Whatley and Samuel Whatley, II |
| Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center |
| 2:2023cv02274 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 OBJECTION to #13 Report and Recommendation by Pacita Whatley, Samuel Whatley, II, and Samuel Whatley. Reply to Objections due by 6/20/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (ahil) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 14 Transfer of Case Management, 12 Clerk's Notice #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #11 Order to Notify of Address Change placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Pacita Whatley, Reverand Dr. Samuel Whatley and Samuel Whatley, II, 579 Folly Road Unit 14254, Charleston, SC 29422. (dist) |
| Filing 14 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Sherri A Lydon. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address:901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29201. (dist) |
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the Complaint be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/2/2023. (dist) |
| Filing 12 Clerk's Notice: #2 #3 #4 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #8 Motion to Seal addressed in #11 . (dist) |
Filing 11
ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/2/2023. (dist)
|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories - submitted with Plaintiffs packet but unsigned. (dist) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Seal by Pacita Whatley, Samuel Whatley, II, Samuel Whatley. Response to Motion due by 6/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Samuel Whatley. Response to Motion due by 6/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Samuel Whatley, II. Response to Motion due by 6/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Pacita Whatley. Response to Motion due by 6/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45..Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center, filed by Pacita Whatley, Samuel Whatley, II, Samuel Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Supporting Documents)(dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
