v. Kamara et al
Rosamond Kamara |
Charleston School of Law, Ed Bell, Nicholas Sanders, Larry Cunningham, William Merkel, Debra Gammons, Cristy Lorente, Alexandria Jones, Chantanee Riley, Destiny Combs and Donovan Coker |
2:2023cv02335 |
May 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
David C Norton |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, 11 blank Forms USM-285 and a blank copy of our 26.01 interrogatories. Terminate Motions, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Rosamond Kamara 2403 Mall Drive Charleston, SC 29406. (dgar) |
Filing 5 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 7/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.), Motion GRANTED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Rosamond Kamara. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 7/6/2023. (dgar) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Rosamond Kamara. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ed Bell, Charleston School of Law, Donovan Coker, Destiny Combs, Larry Cunningham, Debra Gammons, Alexandria Jones, Cristy Lorente, William Merkel, Chantanee Riley, Nicholas Sanders, filed by Rosamond Kamara.(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.