Scott v. State of South Carolina
Petitioner: Antwan L. Scott
Respondent: State of South Carolina and Director Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Case Number: 2:2023cv02800
Filed: June 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2023 Filing 11 OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Antwan L. Scott. Reply to Objections due by 8/25/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Charleston County Public Defender, #2 Envelope)(dgar)
August 2, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Antwan L. Scott. US Attorney General served on 7/31/2023, answer due 9/29/2023. (dgar)
July 25, 2023 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned finds that Petitioner cannot cure the deficiencies in his petition by amendment and therefore RECOMMENDS that the Court DISMISS the petition without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to respond. Objections to R&R due by 8/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 7/25/2023. (dgar)
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 7/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(dgar)
July 17, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Antwan L. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar)
July 10, 2023 Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Proper Form Order, blank Form AO 240 placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Antwan L. Scott 1275096 SACDC 3841 Leeds Ave. North Charleston, SC 29405. (dgar)
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 7/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 7/10/2023. (dgar)
June 20, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Antwan L. Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antwan L. Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?