Karim v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Mohammad Rakibul Karim |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng |
| 2:2023cv03627 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mohammad Rakibul Karim. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipt)(Derrick, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mohammad Rakibul Karim.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mary Elizabeth Brennan Seng, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11232919.), filed by Mohammad Rakibul Karim. Service due by 10/25/2023(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
