Johnson v. Aeropure Acquisition, Inc. et al
Aeropure Acquisition, Inc. and Richard Aaron Paul |
Arthur "Ted" Johnson |
2:2023cv03898 |
August 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Arthur "Ted" Johnson by Richard Aaron Paul, Aeropure Acquisition, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Purchase Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Promissory Note, #3 Exhibit C - Guaranty Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Consulting Agreement)(Hoefer, Paul) (Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4 replaced on 9/21/2023) (gray). |
Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/13/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 1/12/2024, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/12/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/12/2024, Discovery due by 4/12/2024, Motions due by 5/13/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 8/12/2024, Mediation Due by 4/12/2024. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/21/2023. (gray) |
Filing 15 Plaintiff's Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Arthur "Ted" Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)(Lesemann, Ellis) |
Filing 14 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Arthur "Ted" Johnson.(Lesemann, Ellis) |
Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Arthur "Ted" Johnson.(Lesemann, Ellis) |
Filing 12 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Aeropure Acquisition, Inc., Richard Aaron Paul. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Exhibit 1 - proposed Amended Scheduling Order)(Hoefer, Paul) |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Aeropure Acquisition, Inc., Richard Aaron Paul.(Hoefer, Paul) |
Filing 10 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Richard Aaron Paul answer due 9/22/2023; Aeropure Acquisition, Inc. answer due 9/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - consent between counsel)(Hoefer, Paul) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Arthur "Ted" Johnson.(Lesemann, Ellis) |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER: Mediation Due by 2/12/2024. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 8/16/2023. (gray) |
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 9/6/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 9/20/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 9/20/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/11/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 11/13/2023, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/13/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/13/2023, Discovery due by 2/12/2024, Motions due by 3/13/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 6/11/2024, Mediation Due by 2/12/2024. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 8/16/2023. (gray) |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Arthur "Ted" Johnson. All Defendants. (Lesemann, Ellis) |
Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Charleston County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Acknowledgment of Removal)(Hoefer, Paul) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Richard Aaron Paul.(hcor, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Aeropure Acquisition, Inc..(hcor, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1003282. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CSCDC-11252622), filed by Richard Aaron Paul, Aeropure Acquisition, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.