Kern v. Otis Elevator Company
| Deborah Kern |
| Otis Elevator Company and Tenet HealthSystem Medical, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv04337 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 14 Reason: Filed as Duplicate. Filed as docket #15 . (gray) |
| Filing 16 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Tenet HealthSystem Medical, Inc..(Tierney, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 Rule 26(f) Report by Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Scheduling Order, #2 Supporting Documents Mediation Form)(Kendall, Everett) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Deborah Kern.(Buncher, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Christine Kent Toporek for 3/25/24-3/29/24 (Toporek, Christine) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Joseph J Tierney, Jr for 12/18/23-12/22/23; 7/29/24-8/2/24;8/5/24-8/9/24 (Tierney, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tenet HealthSystem Medical, Inc..(Tierney, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Tenet HealthSystem Medical, Inc..(Tierney, Joseph) (Main Document 9 replaced to add case number on 9/21/2023) (gray). |
| Filing 8 Defendant has moved to amend its notice of removal to "better articulate" the grounds for removal. (Dkt. No. #5 ). Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. (Id.). For good cause shown, the motion is granted. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/14/2023. (gray) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/2/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 10/16/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 10/16/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/11/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 1/9/2024, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/8/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/15/2024, Discovery due by 3/11/2024, Motions due by 3/25/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 7/1/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed no sooner than fifteen (15) days and no later than ten (10) days prior to the date certain set for jury selection and trial, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/11/2023. (gray)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Otis Elevator Company.(Kendall, Everett) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal by Otis Elevator Company. Response to Motion due by 9/19/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)No proposed order.(Kendall, Everett) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Deborah Kern.(Buncher, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Otis Elevator Company. (gray) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1003516. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11290754), filed by Otis Elevator Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - NEF, #3 Exhibit C - Stipulation in Amount of Controversy) (gray) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
