Eli Lilly and Company v. Totality Mediaspa LLC
| Eli Lilly and Company |
| Totality Mediaspa LLC |
| 2:2023cv04697 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
***DOCUMENT MAILED courtesy copy of #14 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Stanley Wilhelm, Owner, Totality Medispa LLC, 885B Island Park Drive, Suite B, Daniel Island, S.C. 29492 (sshe, )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER and Opinion: The Court denies the Parties' consent motion for preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 13). Furthermore, the Court directs Defendant to retain counsel within 30 days of this Order. Should Defendant obtain counsel, the Parties may refile their motion for preliminary injunction. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/7/23.(ltap, )
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Eli Lilly and Company. Response to Motion due by 11/14/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Order signed by Defendant)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER granting #9 , #10 , and #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Joseph N. Akrotirianakis, Bruce W. Baber, and Aaron Craig for plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/30/2023. (gray)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Aaron Craig ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11398536) by Eli Lilly and Company. Response to Motion due by 11/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Bruce W. Baber ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11398489) by Eli Lilly and Company. Response to Motion due by 11/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application, #2 Exhibit Letter of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joseph N. Akrotirianakis ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11398288) by Eli Lilly and Company. Response to Motion due by 11/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Totality Mediaspa LLC answer due 11/20/2023. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/19/23.(ltap, )
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eli Lilly and Company re #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Amended Certificate of Service (Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Eli Lilly and Company. Response to Motion due by 10/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Eli Lilly and Company (Johnson, George)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Totality Mediaspa LLC. (gray)
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Eli Lilly and Company. (gray)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Totality Mediaspa LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11328139), filed by Eli Lilly and Company. Service due by 12/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (gray)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eli Lilly and Company v. Totality Mediaspa LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eli Lilly and Company | |
| Represented By: | George Craig Johnson |
| Represented By: | IS Leevy Johnson |
| Represented By: | Aaron Craig |
| Represented By: | Bruce W Baber |
| Represented By: | Joseph N Akrotirianakis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Totality Mediaspa LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
