Beeman et al v. 3M Company et al
| Karl J. Beeman, Sr., Benita Beeman and Karl J. Beeman, Jr. |
| 3M Company, Marken Enterprises, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Archroma US Inc, Arkema Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, ChemDesign Products Inc, Chemguard Inc, Chemicals Inc, Chemours Company FC LLC, Clariant Corp, Corteva Inc, Deepwater Chemicals Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Dynax Corporation, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Kidde-Fenwal Inc, Kidde PLC, Nation Ford Chemical Company, National Foam Inc, The Chemours Company, Tyco Fire Products LP, United Technologies Corporation, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, MarKen PPE Restoration, Steamatic of Southern Nevada and Logistical Solutions, LLC |
| 2:2023cv05350 |
| October 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO NEW COUNSEL: MDL No. 2:18-mn-2873-RMG (LEAD case) is open as the master docket assigned to Judge Richard M. Gergel, District of South Carolina. This civil action is now associated as a member case. All counsel of record are directed to take the steps necessary to be registered as electronic filers in the District of South Carolina (See CMO No. 3 pg. 17 Electronic Filing at 22. footnote 5 (ECF Multidistrict Litigation Attorney Registration Form - available at link at the end of this NOTICE).CMO Nos. 1 - 27, (including any supplemental CMO Nos. i.e., 2.A, etc.) govern all cases in the MDL proceedings and can be viewed in the Lead case. Counsel will be notified by Liaison Counsel re new Case Management Orders and other new documents posted in the lead case. Please also read CLERKS NOTICE(s) TO ALL COUNSEL ASSOCIATED WITH MDL 2873 and QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE(s) filed in the Lead case. NOTICE of Hearing: Next Monthly Status Conference will be via a Telephone Conference set for 10/31/2023 10:00 AM, before Honorable Richard M Gergel (call-in instructions will be circulated prior to each telephonic status conference). See the District Court's website containing information on the MDL at # MDL-2873 (sshe, ) |
| Filing 11 MDL MEMBER CASE OPENED: Nevada (associated as of 10/25/2023), 2:23-cv-01596, Beeman et al v. 3M Company et al, as DSC case 2:23-cv-05350-RMG (sshe, ) |
| Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of Nevada; Case Number 2:23-cv-01596. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 9 Certified MDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-154) transferring case to the District of South Carolina. Signed by MDL on 10/23/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 8 MDL Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-154) transferring case to the District of South Carolina. Signed by MDL on 10/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 MDL Minute Order)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendant 3M Company.. (Fears, Chad) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by 3M Company. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case. (Fears, Chad) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE. To date, a Certificate of Interested Parties has not been filed, pursuant to LR 7.1-1, by 3M Company, Karl J. Beeman, Sr., Benita Beeman, Karl J. Beeman, Jr. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/23/2023. (no image attached) (CJS) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #3 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Responsive pleading deadlines for all Defendants due on the 28th day after the JPML has issued a final order determining whether to transfer this action to the AFFF MDL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 10/13/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.]
|
| Filing 3 Joint STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (First Request) TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re #1 Petition for Removal,, by Defendant 3M Company. (Fears, Chad) (extend) (answer) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Cristina D. Silva on 10/6/2023. Statement regarding removed action is due by 10/21/2023. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 11/5/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Cristina D. Silva and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC) [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District Court, Case Number A-23-871098-C, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANVDC-7451020) by 3M Company. Proof of service due by 8/20/2023. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 10/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fears, Chad) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. [Transferred from Nevada on 10/27/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
