Campbell v. Sodexo Operations LLC et al
Kimberly Campbell |
Sodexo Operations LLC also known as Sodexo Vending Services LLC also known as Sodexo Inc doing business as Sodexo, Sodexo Vending Services LLC, Sodexo Inc and Charles Thomas |
2:2023cv06535 |
December 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Confidentiality Order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/5/24.(ltap, ) |
Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER: Mediation Due by 9/26/2024. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/2/2024. (gray) |
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/30/2024, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 6/26/2024, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 7/29/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/5/2024, Discovery due by 8/26/2024, Motions due by 9/9/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 1/6/2025, Mediation Due by 9/26/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed within 5 days after the case is noticed for date certain for trial, Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 07/09/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/2/2024. (gray) |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Sodexo Operations LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/15/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Smith, Andrew) (Main Document 9 replaced per attorney request on 2/5/2024) (gray). (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/5/2024: #1 Proposed Order) (gray). |
Filing 8 Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Sodexo Operations LLC.(Smith, Andrew) |
Filing 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Sodexo Operations LLC.(Smith, Andrew) |
Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference deadline 01/18/2024, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 02/01/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 02/01/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 03/27/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 04/26/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 05/28/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 06/06/2024, Discovery due by 06/25/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed within 5 days after the case is noticed for date certain for trial, Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions due by 07/09/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection, Case ready for jury selection and/or trial on or after 11/04/2024. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/28/2023. (hcor, ) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sodexo Operations LLC identifying Corporate Parent Sodexo for Sodexo Operations LLC. (gray) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Sodexo Operations LLC. (gray) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sodexo Operations LLC. (gray) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1004267. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11481099), filed by Sodexo Operations LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (gray) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.