Stoudemire v. Thomas et al
| Hazel Stoudemire, SR |
| Sgt. Thomas, Lieutant Priester, Captain Livingston, Bryan Stirling and SCDC Class Action |
| 2:2024cv00124 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Hazel Stoudemire, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) Modified on 2/16/2024 to edit docket text (dgar). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Hazel Stoudemire, SR. (Attachments: #1 Amend Supporting Memorandum, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) Modified on 2/16/2024 to edit docket text (dgar). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Hazel Stoudemire, SR. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Supporting Documents)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Captain Livingston, Lieutant Priester, SCDC Class Action, Bryan Stirling, Thomas, filed by Hazel Stoudemire, SR. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Memo in Support, #3 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
