Richardson v. McCormic
Plaintiff: Brian Richardson
Defendant: Ofc. McCormic
Case Number: 2:2024cv00256
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2024 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order, a blank prisoner complaint form (1983). placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Brian Richardson 06746-017 WILLIAMSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 340 SALTERS, SC 29590. (dgar) Modified on 3/14/2024 to edit docket text (dgar).
March 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The undersigned therefore GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by 4/4/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/14/2024. (dgar)
January 18, 2024 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, Terminate Motions, #1 Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Brian Richardson 06746-017 WILLIAMSBURG FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 340 SALTERS, SC 29590. (dgar)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: If you do not wish to proceed with your claims against Defendant McCormic here, you may file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within twenty-one days of the date this Order is entered, plus three days for mail time, by 2/8/2024. If you do wish to proceed with these claims, you may notify the Court of your intent by filing a supplemental letter, or by doing nothing. If the Court does not receive a notice of voluntary dismissal or response within the time prescribed by this Order, the undersigned will assume that you do wish to proceed with the claims as construed above and shall enter a new order with further instructions. Motion GRANTED: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Brian Richardson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 1/18/2024. (dgar)
January 17, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Brian Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental Attachments)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against McCormic, filed by Brian Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar)
January 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER: This case was severed from Plaintiff's original action, Case No. 2:23-cv-03992-DCN-MGB, for purposes of judicial economy and in keeping with the Prison Litigation Reform Act's ("PLRA"). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 1/17/2024. (dgar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. McCormic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ofc. McCormic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?