1022 Carolina LLC v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc et al
1022 Carolina LLC |
Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc and The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance Company |
2:2024cv00647 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/15/2024. (gray) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc (Wieters, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Charleston County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Filed Acknowledgment of Removal)(Wieters, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc. (gray) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1005666. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11579849), filed by Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (gray) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.