Morgan et al v. Lucas et al
Plaintiff: Suzanne Morgan and Michael Morgan
Defendant: John Lucas and Lisa Lucas
Case Number: 2:2024cv00912
Filed: February 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2024 Filing 8 Rule 26(f) Report by Michael Morgan, Suzanne Morgan.(Bradley, J)
March 5, 2024 Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 4/11/2024, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 5/10/2024, Rule 26 Report due by 5/10/2024, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/24/2024, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/15/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/16/2024, Discovery due by 12/6/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 1/10/2025, Jury Selection Deadline 2/1/2025, Mediation Due by 1/31/2025. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 03/05/2024. (hcor, )
March 4, 2024 Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Michael Morgan, Suzanne Morgan.(Bradley, J)
February 28, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Clarendon County. (Smith, Nicholas)
February 22, 2024 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by John Lucas, Lisa Lucas. (hcor, )
February 22, 2024 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by John Lucas, Lisa Lucas.(hcor, )
February 22, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clarendon County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024CP1400006. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11608370), filed by Lisa Lucas, John Lucas. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Affidavits of Service)(hcor, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan et al v. Lucas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne Morgan
Represented By: J Edward Bradley
Represented By: William H Edwards
Represented By: Jack Bradley Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Morgan
Represented By: J Edward Bradley
Represented By: William H Edwards
Represented By: Jack Bradley Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Lucas
Represented By: Bradish Johnson Waring
Represented By: Kenyatta L Gardner
Represented By: Nicholas Denver Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Lucas
Represented By: Bradish Johnson Waring
Represented By: Kenyatta L Gardner
Represented By: Nicholas Denver Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?