UVAS, LLC et al v. Tru-D SmartUVC, LLC
UVAS, LLC and Jeffery L. Deal |
Tru-D SmartUVC, LLC d/b/a Tru-D, LLC |
2:2024cv01333 |
March 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE by UVAS, LLC, Jeffery L. Deal. All Defendants. (Ford, Ian) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion to Seal Document #5 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint file exhibits under seal and redact portions of complaint Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/25/2024.(eric, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint file exhibits under seal and redact portions of complaint by Jeffery L. Deal, UVAS, LLC. Response to Motion due by 4/4/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Description of Documents and Redacted Info.)No proposed order.(Ford, Ian) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tru-D SmartUVC, LLC. (hcor, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jeffery L. Deal, UVAS, LLC.(hcor, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tru-D SmartUVC, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BSCDC-11658887.), filed by UVAS, LLC, Jeffery L. Deal. Service due by 6/17/2024(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.