Jones v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs et al
Ruby Jones |
South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastla Center-Highlands 510, South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastal Center-Highlands Hillside, Freddie Lee Cunningham and Nyosha Young |
2:2024cv02511 |
April 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Freddie Lee Cunningham, South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs(d/b/a Coastal Center-Highlands Hillside), South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs(d/b/a Coastla Center-Highlands 510), Nyosha Young. (hcor, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ruby Jones.(hcor, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Freddie Lee Cunningham, South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs(d/b/a Coastal Center-Highlands Hillside), South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs(d/b/a Coastla Center-Highlands 510), Nyosha Young ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11729533.), filed by Ruby Jones. Service due by 7/24/2024(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.