Seamon v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
Tracy Seamon |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC and dormakaba USA, Inc. |
2:2024cv03038 |
May 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC re #4 Answer to Complaint Notice of Removal, 2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories, #1 Notice of Removal, (hcor, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC. (hcor, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by CVS Pharmacy, Inc., South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC.(hcor, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024CP1001908. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11766036), filed by South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 State Court Documents Aff of Service on SC CVS Pharmacy LLC, #3 State Court Documents Aff of Service on dormakaba USA Inc, #4 State Court Documents Aff of Service on CVS Pharmacy Inc)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.