Goss v. Richardson et al
Darrell L. Goss |
Stacey Richardson and Christina Catoe Bigelow |
2:2024cv03618 |
June 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order Service - Non-Inmate, Terminate Motions, #10 Summons Issued placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Darrell L. Goss 2125 Aberdeen Ave. Apt. 104 North Charleston, SC 29405. (dgar) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Christina Catoe Bigelow, Stacey Richardson. Service due by 10/28/2024. (dgar) |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address by Darrell L. Goss. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, a blank financial certificate placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Darrell L. Goss 305517 Evans Correctional Institution 610 Highway 9 West Bennettsville, SC 29512. (dgar) Modified on 6/26/2024 to edit docket text (dgar). |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Darrell L. Goss. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christina Catoe Bigelow, Stacey Richardson, filed by Darrell L. Goss.(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.