Monat Global Corp v. Treloar et al
| Monat Global Corp |
| Toni Vanschoyck and James Treloar |
| 2:2024cv05084 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case by Toni Vanschoyck. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Monat's Policies and Procedures, #3 Exhibit B - Docket Report, #4 Exhibit C - Second Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit D - 08/19/2024 Email, #6 Exhibit E - Order Dissolving TRO)No proposed order.(McCullough, Clayton) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by James Treloar, Toni Vanschoyck.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024-CP-10-04384. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11991706), filed by James Treloar, Toni Vanschoyck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - State Court Docket Sheet)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
