Babb et al v. Dahlheim et al
Plaintiff: David Anthony Babb and DAB, LLC
Defendant: Katherine Dahlheim and City of Charleston, South Carolina
Case Number: 2:2024cv05910
Filed: October 16, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Molly H Cherry
Referring Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2024 Filing 22 SUR REPLY to #21 REPLY to #19 Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by David Anthony Babb, DAB, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (agaz, )
December 5, 2024 Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Reply to Plaintiff's Second Response) Response filed by Katherine Dahlheim. (Johnson, James)
December 2, 2024 Filing 20 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Katherine Dahlheim. Response to Motion due by 12/16/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Johnson, James)
November 26, 2024 Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by David Anthony Babb, DAB, LLC. Reply to Response to Motion due by 12/3/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (agaz, )
November 22, 2024 Filing 18 SUR REPLY to REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand Surresponse in Opposition Response filed by City of Charleston, South Carolina, Katherine Dahlheim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's State Filing)(Johnson, James)
November 22, 2024 Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 16 Text Order GRANTING Motion for Leave to File, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to David Anthony Babb PO BOX 522 Charleston, SC 29402 AND to DAB, LLC PO BOX 522 Charleston, SC 29402. (agaz, )
November 22, 2024 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to File Surresponse. Defendants have until December 2, 2024, to file their Surresponse on the docket. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 11/22/2024. (agaz, )
November 20, 2024 Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File Surresponse in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by City of Charleston, South Carolina, Katherine Dahlheim. Response to Motion due by 12/4/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendants' Surresponse, #2 Exhibit 2 - Defendants' Surresponse Exhibit A)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Johnson, James)
November 15, 2024 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response filed by David Anthony Babb.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/22/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (agaz, )
November 15, 2024 Filing 13 REPLY to #11 Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand. Response filed by David Anthony Babb. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (agaz, )
November 13, 2024 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Katherine Dahlheim. (Johnson, James)
November 6, 2024 Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand Response filed by City of Charleston, South Carolina, Katherine Dahlheim.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/13/2024 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Johnson, James)
November 6, 2024 Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by David Anthony Babb, DAB, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/13/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (agaz, )
October 30, 2024 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Roseboro Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to DAB, LLC PO BOX 522 Charleston, SC 29402 AND to David Anthony Babb PO BOX 522 Charleston, SC 29402. (agaz, )
October 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward summary judgment explanation to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by 12/2/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 10/30/2024. (agaz, )
October 23, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand by David Anthony Babb. Response to Motion due by 11/6/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) Motions referred to Molly H Cherry. (agaz, )
October 23, 2024 Filing 6 REPLY by David Anthony Babb to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (agaz, )
October 23, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Charleston, South Carolina.(Johnson, James)
October 23, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Katherine Dahlheim. Response to Motion due by 11/6/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Johnson, James)
October 16, 2024 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Charleston, South Carolina, Katherine Dahlheim. (agaz, )
October 16, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024-CP-10-04605. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BSCDC-12051011), filed by Katherine Dahlheim, City of Charleston, South Carolina. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (agaz, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babb et al v. Dahlheim et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katherine Dahlheim
Represented By: James Matthew Johnson
Represented By: J W Nelson Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Charleston, South Carolina
Represented By: James Matthew Johnson
Represented By: J W Nelson Chandler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Anthony Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAB, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?