Drakeford v. Tuomey Healthcare System Inc
| Michael K Drakeford and USA |
| Tuomey |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, Wesmark Ambulatory Surgery Center LLc, James Arthur Goodson, III, Kim Saccone and Douglas Cardinal |
| 3:2005cv02858 |
| October 4, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Sumter |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
886
AMENDED ORDER and OPINION re 881 ORDER AND OPINION granting 818 Motion for Damages; denying without prejudice 823 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 824 Motion to Require Election of Remedies; deny ing without prejudice 826 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 827 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 827 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 10/2/2013, nunc pro tunc 9/30/2013. (mdea )
|
|
Filing
881
ORDER AND OPINION granting 818 Motion for Damages; denying without prejudice 823 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 824 Motion to Require Election of Remedies; denying without prejudice 826 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 827 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 827 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 9/30/2013.(mdea )
|
|
Filing
763
ORDER ON JURY INSTRUCTIONS Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 3/29/2013. (asni, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
