Doe et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv03663
Filed: December 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER granting 185 Motion to Alter Judgment/Order, ordering that all claims and all parties in this action have been dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/2/2010.(bshr, )
October 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 183 ORDER declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismissing without prejudice the plaintiffs' remaining state law claims. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 10/12/2010. (bshr, )
September 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 176 ORDER inviting parties to brief the court on the matter of the Plaintiffs' state law claim for gross negligence in regards to whether or not the court should remand this claim to state court. Briefs should be filed by 09/28/2010. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 09/13/2010. (bshr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?