Martin et al v. Lott et al
Plaintiff: Carlos Edward Martin and Tashiana Anita Martin
Defendant: Leon Lott, Ben Fields and Joseph Clark
Case Number: 3:2007cv03782
Filed: November 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER denying 85 MOTION to Alter Judgment Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Carlos Edward Martins 1983 Claims for False Imprisonment and Excessive Force, First Amendment Claim and State Claim for False Arrest and MOTION for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54b. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 02/23/10.(bshr, )
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER granting in part 64 Deputies' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Mr. Martin on all claims and as to the claim of excessive force asserted by Mrs. Martin, notifying that Mrs. Martin's § 1983 claims for illegal seizure and false a rrest, and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment remain for trial, remanding the Richland County Court of Common pleas Mr. Martin's and Mrs. Martin's claims against Sheriff Leon Lott pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment, and notifying that the trial of this case will proceed as scheduled during the March/April 2010 term of court with jury selection will take place on March 9, 2010. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 02/09/10.(bshr, )
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER denying 63 Motion for Court Order Dismissing First, Second, and Third Causes of Action. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 12/21/09.(bshr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin et al v. Lott et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Edward Martin
Represented By: J Christopher Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tashiana Anita Martin
Represented By: J Christopher Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leon Lott
Represented By: Robert David Garfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Fields
Represented By: Robert David Garfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Clark
Represented By: Robert David Garfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?