Jenkins v. Smith
Plaintiff: Esau Jenkins, III
Defendant: Franklin Smith
Case Number: 3:2008cv00434
Filed: February 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Prison:Prison Condition Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: Joseph R McCrorey
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 41(b), for 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on September 9, 2008. (kbos)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esau Jenkins, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?