Wilder v. Brooks et al
| Samuel Anthony Wilder |
| Charles T Brooks, III, Markley R Dennis, Jr, Donald J Zelenka and Lonetta B Brawley |
| 3:2008cv03089 |
| September 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Charleston |
| Joseph R McCrorey |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983pr (Other) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The case shall be deemed a "strike" for purposes of 1915(g), for 8 Report and Recommendations, 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Motion for TRO filed by Samuel Anthony Wilder. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on February 3, 2009. (kbos)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the district court deny the motion for preliminary injunction/tro. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the district court dismiss the complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process, re 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Samuel Anthony Wilder, Objections to R&R due by 10/27/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey on October 6, 2008. (kbos)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
