Boling v. Mohawk Industries Inc et al
| William D Boling, IV |
| Mohawk Industries Inc and Elbert Dane Hammond |
| 3:2009cv00046 |
| January 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Motor Vehicle Office |
| Richland |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE and directing that the court will retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of the settlement, if necessary. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 01/07/2011. (bshr, )
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 43 MOTION to Strike and Exclude Expert Witness Tyler Kress and to Strike Certain Portions of the Deposition of Plaintiff's Expert Jeff Muttart and For Attorneys Fees, denying 58 MOTION to Strike and Exclude Defendants� 39; Witness Judy Edwards Bruyn, denying 48 MOTION for relief from Local Civil Rule 16.02(D)(3) deadline and seeking acceptance of four additional records custodian affidavits out of time, denying 49 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, denying 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and notifying parties the case will proceed to trial during the September/October 2010 Term of Court. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 07/27/2010.(bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
