USA v. Able
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Winston Able
Case Number: 3:2009cv00537
Filed: March 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Taxes Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 26:7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 46 Report and Recommendations, granting 44 Motion for Default Judgment, and entering a permanent injunction against defendant Able, both individually and doing business as Reclaim Services. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 06/14/2010. (bshr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Able
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: John Douglas Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winston Able
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?