Continental Casualty Company v. Jones et al
Continental Casualty Company |
James R Jones, II, Carolina Jones, Elizabeth Leitner, Jones Leitner & Co, Jones and Leitner CPAS PA, Jones Leitner Inc, Jones Reeves & Co, Eric E Youngblood, Dana C Sheppard, Joe Henry Inc, Joe Henry Company 401K Plan, Joseph E Chambers, Henry C Moore, David S Johnson, Catherine Johnson, Christopher M Luper Trust, Christopher M Luper and Peggy Luper |
3:2009cv01004 |
April 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
XUS, Outside State |
Joseph F Anderson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 239 ORDER granting 237 Motion to Dismiss and for Entry of Judgment. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 05/29/2012.(bshr, ) |
Filing 232 ORDER granting summary judgment in favor of Continental Casualty Company against the Youngblood defendants and notifying the Leitner defendants that the court has not received notice of any settlement regarding their claims and they are currently set for trial during the court's May/June term with Jury Selection set for 05/08/2012. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 02/17/2012. (bshr, ) |
Filing 228 ORDER notifying parties the court wishes to hear additional oral argument on the question of whether waiver and estoppel apply to the claims of the Youngblood defendants in this case on 02/08/2012 at 10:00 AM and directing that no additional briefing is necessary. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 01/27/2012. (bshr, ) |
Filing 201 ORDER denying 148 Motion for Summary Judgment by Jones Leitner & Co, Jones Leitner Inc, Jones Reeves & Co, Jones and Leitner CPAS PA, Elizabeth Leitner; granting 149 Motion for Summary Judgment by Continental Casualty Comp any; denying 150 Motion for Summary Judgment by Dana C Sheppard, Eric E Youngblood; denying 151 Motion for Summary Judgment by Catherine Johnson, David S Johnson, W Shell Suber, Jr.; denying 189 Motion for Summary Judgment Refiled by Catherine Johnson, David S Johnson, W Shell Suber, Jr. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 9/2/11.(mflo, ) |
Filing 179 ORDER dismissing without prejudice 148 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice 149 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice 150 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice 151 Motion for Summary Judgment, and notifying that the court grants leave to refile the motions when the case is unstayed. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 02/15/2011.(bshr, ) |
Filing 135 ORDER denying without prejudice 121 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 06/16/2010.(bshr, ) |
Filing 122 ORDER denying 107 Motion to Compel; denying 108 Motion to Compel Discovery/for Joinder. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 05/17/2010.(bshr, ) |
Filing 106 ORDER directing that, pursuant to to 26 U.S.C. § 7216(b)(1)(B), tax return information may be produced to the extent it appears in the files otherwiseproducible by the Leitner defendants in response to discovery from the other parties in this ca se and that such documents so produced shall be confidential and covered by the terms of the confidentiality order entered by this court. Also notifying that such production under the terms of this order shall not expose the Leitner defendants to liability under 26 U.S.C. § 7216(a). Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 12/23/09. (bshr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.