Columbia International University vs Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Columbia International University
Defendant:
Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
Case Number:
3:2009cv01214
Filed:
May 8, 2009
Court:
South Carolina District Court
Office:
Columbia Office
County:
Richland
Presiding Judge:
Matthew J Perry
Nature of Suit:
Defendant
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Columbia International University vs Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Columbia International University | |
| Represented By: | Everett Augustus Kendall, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Earhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.