Treece v. SCDMH et al
| Virgil Treece |
| SCDMH, Shelly Winston-Wood, PSO Gaither and Ron Whitehead |
| 3:2010cv02354 |
| September 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Joseph R McCrorey |
| David C Norton |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; affirming 56 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/15/2012.(eric, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 37 Motion for Sanctions; denying 39 Motion to Strike ; denying 17 Motion for defendant SCDMH to cease and desist providing legal counsel or funds for private legal counsel for defendants Winston-Wood, Gaither, Whitehead; denying 27 Motion to Compel; denying 29 Motion for Protective Order; Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey on 12/27/2011.(jpet, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER affirming 7 Report and Recommendations; defendant SCDMH is hereby dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 12/9/2010.(eric, )
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the district court dismiss defendant SCDMH without prejudice and without issuance and service of process, re 1 Complaint filed by Virgil Treece, Objections to R&R due by 11/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey on October 4, 2010. (kbos)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
