Jeter v. Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit South Carolina District Court Jeter v. Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center

Jeter v. Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center

Plaintiff:	Jesse James Jeter
Defendant:	Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center
Case Number:	3:2010cv02832
Filed:	November 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Richland
Presiding Judge:	Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge:	Joseph R McCrorey
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12117
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 14, 2012	Filing 82 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting in part 75 Report and Recommendation; denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing remainder of case without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/14/2012. (cbru, )
July 29, 2011	Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 17 Motion to Dismiss, denying 13 Motion for Default Judgment, denying 16 Motion for Default Judgment, adopting the Report's result but not its reasoning re 25 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff should be allowed until September 30, 2011 to properly serve Defendant with the amended complaint modified to properly identify Defendant. Defendant is granted leave to file a subsequent motion to dismiss if service is not perfected by September 30, 2011. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 7/29/2011. (cbru, ) Modified to edit text on 7/29/2011 (cbru, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

December 14, 2012

Filing 82 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting in part 75 Report and Recommendation; denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing remainder of case without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/14/2012. (cbru, )

July 29, 2011

Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 17 Motion to Dismiss, denying 13 Motion for Default Judgment, denying 16 Motion for Default Judgment, adopting the Report's result but not its reasoning re 25 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff should be allowed until September 30, 2011 to properly serve Defendant with the amended complaint modified to properly identify Defendant. Defendant is granted leave to file a subsequent motion to dismiss if service is not perfected by September 30, 2011. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 7/29/2011. (cbru, ) Modified to edit text on 7/29/2011 (cbru, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeter v. Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse James Jeter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Palmetto Healthy Internal Medicine Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?