Green v. Richland County Sheriff's Dept et al
Charles Green |
Richland County Sheriff's Dept, Leon Lott and Tom Hodges |
3:2010cv03162 |
December 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Richland |
Joseph R McCrorey |
Joseph F Anderson |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER directing SCDC to transport Plaintiff Charles Green to the court for trial on 08/26/2013 - 08/27/2013. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 08/01/2013. (bshr, ) |
Filing 62 ORDER and FIFTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Discovery due by 8/18/2012, Motions due by 9/20/2012. Motions terminated: granted 61 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time or Alternatively Request for Status Conference filed by Charles Green, Leon Lott, Tom Hodges. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/25/2012. (abuc) |
Filing 49 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 45 Report and Recommendations, denying 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 01/09/2012. (bshr, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, dismissing defendant Richland County Sheriff's Dept, for 11 Report and Recommendations, Richland County Sheriff's Dept terminated. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on March 21, 2011. (kbos) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.