Samuel et al v. FIFA et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 28, 2015
ORDER / SECOND AND FINAL WARNING notifying Plaintiffs Loretta L. Samuel and William R. Samuel that all communications made in this case must be in writing, no telephonic communication will be permitted, and that further violations of the Court's order will result in Plaintiffs being held in contempt of court. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 01/28/2015. (bshr, )
|May 16, 2013
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 197 Report and Recommendation, granting 166 Motion for Summary Judgment, denying as moot 164 MOTION that the case continue with trial or settlement, denying as moot [1 81] Motion for Hearing, denying as moot 186 Motion for Hearing, denying as moot 187 Motion for Settlement, denying as moot 191 Motion for Hearing, denying as moot 201 Motion for Damages. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 05/16/2013. (bshr, )
|September 26, 2012
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 162 Report and Recommendation, denying 138 Motion to Dismiss, and dismissing Federation Internationale de Football Association without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Margaret B Seymour on 9/26/2012. (jpet, )
|October 26, 2011
ORDER directing plaintiffs to notify the court within fourteen days from the date of this order of the identity of replacement counsel or of the plaintiff's desire to proceed with this litigation without an attorney( Status Report due by 11/9/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 10/26/2011. (jpet, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?