Mouzone v. Caterpillar Inc
| Chauncey Mouzone |
| Caterpillar Inc |
| 3:2011cv03355 |
| December 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Sumter |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Caterpillar Inc, Chauncey Mouzone. (Bettis, Vance) |
Filing 27
SECOND CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER( Discovery due by 11/21/2012, Motions due by 12/7/2012, ADR Statement due by 11/21/2012, Mediation Due by 12/20/2012) Motions terminated: #26 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #16 Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 8/15/2012. (jpet, )
|
| Filing 26 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct #16 Scheduling Order, by Caterpillar Inc, Chauncey Mouzone. Response to Motion due by 8/30/2012. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Bettis, Vance) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Donald Gist for April 10, 2012-April 30, 2012 (Gist, Donald) |
| Filing 20 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #18 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/27/2012.(jpet, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Karl Phillip Tadlock ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-3945252) by Caterpillar Inc. Response to Motion due by 3/26/2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cert. Good Standing- GA, #2 Exhibit Cert. Good Standing-CA, #3 Exhibit Application)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counselMotions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Bettis, Vance) |
|
Filing 16
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/25/2012, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/25/2012, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/25/2012, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/25/2012, Discovery due by 8/23/2012, Motions due by 9/7/2012, ADR Statement due by 8/23/2012, Mediation Due by 9/21/2012,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/8/2012. (jpet, )
|
| Filing 15 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/8/2012.(jpet, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joseph S. Turner ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number 0420-3937190) by Caterpillar Inc. Response to Motion due by 3/23/2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Additional Bar Membership, #3 Exhibit Application)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counselMotions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Bettis, Vance) Modified to replace main document with corrected document as provided by filing user on 3/8/2012 (jpet, ). |
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Chauncey Mouzone.(Gist, Donald) |
| Filing 11 DEFENDANT'S Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Caterpillar Inc.(Bettis, Vance) |
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Caterpillar Inc, Chauncey Mouzone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan)(Bettis, Vance) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 3/1/2012, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/25/2012, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/25/2012, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/25/2012, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/25/2012, Discovery due by 8/23/2012, Motions due by 9/7/2012, ADR Statement due by 10/9/2012, Mediation Due by 11/6/2012,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 1/27/2012. (jpet, )
|
| Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett. Judge Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges no longer assigned to the case. (pcas, ) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Caterpillar Inc.(Bettis, Vance) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Caterpillar Inc.(Bettis, Vance) |
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges. Judge Magistrate Judge Joseph R McCrorey no longer assigned to the case. (suro, ) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Chauncey Mouzone.(kbos) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Caterpillar Inc. (kbos) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caterpillar Inc ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-3772783.), filed by Chauncey Mouzone.(kbos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mouzone v. Caterpillar Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chauncey Mouzone | |
| Represented By: | Donald Gist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caterpillar Inc | |
| Represented By: | Vance J Bettis |
| Represented By: | Karl Phillip Tadlock |
| Represented By: | Joseph S Turner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
