Brunson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Ronald Brunson |
| Eric Holder, William N Nettles and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 3:2012cv00152 |
| January 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Sumter |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting 21 Report and Recommendations, dismissing the action with prejudice, and warning plaintiff that if he continues to file complaints with this court claiming that defendants or others have implanted a device in his body and that they are investigating him, this court will impose sanctions. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 07/13/2012. (bshr, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 6/13/2012. (abuc) Modified to edit text on 6/14/2012 (abuc).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER directing plaintiff to clarify the intent with which document 1 was filed, ( Specific Document due by 2/6/2012). Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 1/20/2012. (jpet, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
