Brazell v. Good Year Tire & Rubber Company
Plaintiff: Aundrea Brazell
Defendant: Good Year Tire & Rubber Company
Case Number: 3:2012cv02576
Filed: September 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 10 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 11/1/2012.(abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brazell v. Good Year Tire & Rubber Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Good Year Tire & Rubber Company
Represented By: Listervelt Bakari Middleton
Represented By: Charles T Speth, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aundrea Brazell
Represented By: Janet Elizabeth Rhodes
Represented By: Benjamin M Mabry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?