Tant v. Frick et al
| David Ray Tant |
| William Frick, Michael Stobbe, David Tatarsky, John Doe, South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, South Carolina Office of the Attorney General, The, South Carolina Department of Pardon Probation and Parole, The and Fairfield County Solicitor's Office, The |
| 3:2012cv03020 |
| October 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER RULING ON 92 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 59 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, 60 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by South Carolina Department of Probati on Parole and Pardon Services, 62 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Solicitor's Office for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, William Frick, South Carolina Office of the Attorney General, The. The Report is adopted in part and rejected i n part. The court accepts the recommendation that the federal claim should be dismissed on summary judgment. As to the state law claims asserted in this action, such claims are hereby remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for Richland County, South Carolina. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 9/8/2014. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
