Robinson v. SC Dept of Mental Health et al
Shawn Michael Robinson |
SC Dept of Mental Health, Dwight Green, Robert Vick, Leonard Ramsey, Rosalind Dendy, Jarvis Borum, James M Koons, Eric Rotenberry and Benjamin Williams |
3:2013cv00073 |
January 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Richland |
Cameron McGowan Currie |
Shiva V Hodges |
Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 OPINION and ORDER RULING ON 105 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 69 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by James M Koons, Dwight Green, SC Dept of Mental Health, Leonard Ramsey, Eric Rotenberry, Benjamin Williams, Jarv is Borum, Robert Vick. Defendants' summary judgment motion is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied as to Plaintiff's claim of excessive force against Defendants Green, Vick, Ramsey, Borum, Rotenberry, and Williams. Th e motion is granted on Plaintiff's official capacity claims and claims of racial discrimination, religious discrimination, and conspiracy. Defendant James Koons is dismissed from this matter with prejudice. This matter shall proceed to trial on Plaintiffs claim of excessive force as to Defendants Dwight Green, Robert Vick, Leonard Ramsey, Jarvis Borum, Eric Rotenberry, and Benjamin Williams. A pretrial conference shall be scheduled at a later date where the court will discuss any outstanding matters including jury selection on November 13, 2014, and a trial date. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 9/8/2014. (abuc) |
Filing 89 OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION agreeing with 75 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Defendants Rosalind Dendy and SC Dept of Mental Health without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 1/30/2014. (jpet, ) |
Filing 82 ORDER re 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Based on the foregoing, Plaint iff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment by January 23, 2014. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 1/9/2014. (abuc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.