Perez v. Staples Contract and Commercial Inc
Thomas E Perez |
Staples Contract and Commercial Inc and Staples Inc |
3:2013cv01775 |
June 28, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Richland |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Joseph F Anderson |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 CONSENT DECREE granting 56 First MOTION to Enter Final Consent Decree, resolving all claims asserted in this action without further litigation. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 05/27/2015.(bshr, ) |
Filing 37 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 35 Report and Recommendation, denying 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and notifying parties they are permitted to conduct limited discovery on the is sue of whether Defendants are an integrated and/or joint employer under the FMLA, whether Defendants employed more than 50 employees within a 75-mile radius of Angstadts worksite, and granting Defendants leave to refile their motion for summary judgment on this issue at the conclusion of the limited discovery period. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 08/27/2014. (bshr, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, finding as moot 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr on 10/07/2013. (bshr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.