Belfor USA Inc v. Britt et al
| Belfor USA Inc |
| Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund I, Jerry Ray Britt and Seneca Insurance Company Inc |
| 3:2013cv01967 |
| July 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| XUS, Outside State |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 78 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 05/06/2014.(bshr, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 62 Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant Jerry Ray Britt, deferring entry of judgment against Britt until the conclusion of the case. Signed by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 03/11/2014.(bshr, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 55 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees, directing Defendant Jerry Ray Britt to pay Plaintiff $967.90 within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 02/14/2014.(bshr, )
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendant Jerry Ray Britt, directing Defendant Jerry Ray Britt to respond to the plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents within 14 days. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr on 01/24/2014.(bshr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
