Ball v. Derrick et al
| Brittany Ball |
| Paul Allen Derrick, Leon Lott, Richland County Sheriffs Department, Richland County SC and Buffalo Wild Wings |
| 3:2014cv00770 |
| March 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
JUDGMENT dismissing the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER - plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendants' motions for summary judgment 67 and 69 within seven (7) days from the date of this order. If she fails to respond, this action may be decided on the record presented in support of the defendants' motion, or may be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 4/7/2015. (gmil) Modified to correct filing date on 4/8/2015 (gmil).
|
|
Filing
53
REDACTED ORDER re 48 MOTION for issuance of Subpoena filed by Buffalo Wild Wings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 1/5/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
46
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 43 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 9/8/2014.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
