Brown v. Elliot et al
| Arlean K Brown |
| Brian Elliot, Jim Matthews, Kershaw County Sheriff's Office and Kershaw County |
| 3:2014cv01188 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Kershaw |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER: Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees against the defendants in the amount of $11,550.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/30/2016. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting 43 Report and Recommendation, granting in part denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1-1 at 45-57) are DISMISSED, and the remaining claims are REMANDED to state court. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/27/2016. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying the parties' 49 and 50 motions for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/23/2016. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 29 motion for sanctions and directing the plaintiff to file an affidavit of fees and costs for the court's review on or before August 10, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 7/20/2016. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
