Alston et al v. Directv Inc et al
| James Alston, Carnell Bullock, Mark Hilton, Zachary Jenkins, James Kile, Rhett Linley, John McPherson, Jesus Morales, Jeffrey Naves, Mark Ramsey, Joseph Robinson, Carl Simon, Michael Turner, Khehadi Watkins, Corey Gleaton, Nolan Pegues, Howard Poole and Alan Ryman |
| Directv Inc, Directv LLC and Mastec North America Inc |
| 3:2014cv04093 |
| October 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Dorchester |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
189
ORDER granting 188 Consent MOTION to Reopen Case for Purposes of Settlement Approval ( Specific Document due by 7/9/2018). Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 6/26/2018. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER AND OPINION denying in part 87 - 100 Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 5/26/2017.(mbro, )
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER AND OPINION granting 70 Motion to enforce the two subpoenas. Gustech and its representatives are DIRECTED to comply with the subpoenas on or before May 17, 2017, to the extent set forth in this order. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 5/3/2017.(asni, )
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 5/22/2015.(cbru, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
