Paschal v. Lott et al
| Kay F Paschal |
| Leon Lott, Stan Smith, Howard Hughes, Heidi Scott and Richland County South Carolina |
| 3:2014cv04737 |
| December 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER accepting the 59 Report and Recommendation and granting the Defendants' 40 motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L. Wooten on 9/28/2016. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER directing plaintiff to advise the court as to whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to defendants' 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment (7) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 2/3/2016. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER terminating as moot 4 Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim filed by Stan Smith, Howard Hughes in light of the Petitioners amended complaint. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for continued proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 8/17/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in dismissal of the complaint against Defendants Stan Smith and Howard Hughes. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 7/22/2015. (gmil)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER - Plaintiff may file a proposed amended complaint in connection with a properly supported motion to amend within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order. The Court will stay its decision on the 17 Report and Recommendation and the Defendants' motion to dismiss 4 and revisit the matter after the 30 days have expired. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 6/5/2015. (gmil)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
