Guess v. Adams et al
| Thurmond R Guess, Sr |
| David Adams and Shirley S Tapp |
| 3:2015cv00657 |
| February 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER denying 39 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 39 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 1/28/2016.(mdea )
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION and ORDER adopting 31 Report and Recommendation, granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/14/2015. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
19
OPINION and ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting in part 16 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Plaintiff's claims for relief under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act without prejudice, and returning case to Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett for further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 4/7/2015. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Motions granted: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Restricted Access) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/16/2015. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
