Mack v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Plaintiff: Roberta Mack
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Transportation
Case Number: 3:2015cv02624
Filed: July 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Mary G Lewis
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendation and granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 5/16/2016. (cbru, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mack v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roberta Mack
Represented By: James Lewis Cromer
Represented By: James Paul Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Transportation
Represented By: Vance J Bettis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?