Jones v. South Carolina, State of et al
| Quanjay Jaculb Jones |
| South Carolina, State of, Richland, The County of and Humane SPCA, The |
| 3:2016cv00706 |
| March 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
AMENDED ORDER adopting in part and modifying in part the 61 Report and Recommendation. The Defendants' 57 motion for summary judgment is granted as to all pending federal claims and also granted as to Jones' action for gross negligence. The gross negligence claim is dismissed with prejudice based upon the applicable statute of limitations. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 3/22/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER adopting the 61 Report and Recommendation to the extent that it recommends dismissal of all pending federal claims, and modifying the Report to the extent that Jones' remaining action for gross negligence is dismissed with prejudice based upon the applicable statute of limitations. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 3/21/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER adopting the 45 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Jones' actions against Defendant The Humane SPCA with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 11/9/2016. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
