Evans v. International Paper Company

Evans v. International Paper Company

Plaintiff:	Deanna Evans
Defendant:	International Paper Company
Case Number:	3:2016cv01215
Filed:	April 19, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Richland
Presiding Judge:	J Michelle Childs
Presiding Judge:	Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2018	Filing 94 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part and rejecting in part Report and Recommendations re 82 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 03/31/2018.(vdou, )
April 4, 2017	Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff may depose Hai Ninh on the limited subject matter set out above, and must do so no later than May 4, 2017. Further, to the extent Defendant has not s upplemented its responses as contemplated in Defendant's Memorandum, ECF No. 38 , it is instructed to do so by May 4, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(B).As deadlines in the Second Amended Scheduling Order, ECF No. 31 , had been held in abeyance p ending this ruling, see ECF No. 42 , the court provides the following scheduling information: any dispositive motions in this matter are to be filed no later than June 5, 2017; and revised trial-related deadlines will be provided after the court's order ruling on any dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 04/04/2017.(dsto, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2018

Filing 94 ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part and rejecting in part Report and Recommendations re 82 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 03/31/2018.(vdou, )

April 4, 2017

Filing 52 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff may depose Hai Ninh on the limited subject matter set out above, and must do so no later than May 4, 2017. Further, to the extent Defendant has not s upplemented its responses as contemplated in Defendant's Memorandum, ECF No. 38 , it is instructed to do so by May 4, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(B).As deadlines in the Second Amended Scheduling Order, ECF No. 31 , had been held in abeyance p ending this ruling, see ECF No. 42 , the court provides the following scheduling information: any dispositive motions in this matter are to be filed no later than June 5, 2017; and revised trial-related deadlines will be provided after the court's order ruling on any dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 04/04/2017.(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. International Paper Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Evans
Represented By:	James Lewis Cromer
Represented By:	Shannon Polvi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: International Paper Company
Represented By:	James Walker Coleman, IV
Represented By:	Karen Elizabeth Spain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?