Niblock v. Richland County D.S.S. et al
| Sharne Louise Niblock |
| Richland County D.S.S. and Richland County Police Department |
| 3:2016cv01644 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Richland |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER and OPINION RULING ON 64 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges. Defendant Perry is dismissed because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim and the Court grants 59 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Barbretta Cook, Shanett Smith, Angela Nazzery-Scott. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/22/2018. (vdru, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying Plaintiff's motions 35 36 for entry of default judgment and denying Plaintiff's 33 motion to substitute. The Defendants are directed to file their answers/responsive pleadings by February 22, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/6/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Motions granted: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/3/2016. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
