Hooper v. Bridgeway Solutions Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kathy Hooper
Defendant: Bridgeway Solutions Inc. and Mike Bridges
Case Number: 3:2016cv01800
Filed: June 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Lexington
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Referring Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: Both
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hooper v. Bridgeway Solutions Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy Hooper
Represented By: Joseph Daniel Dickey, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgeway Solutions Inc.
Represented By: Susan L Haire
Represented By: Jeffrey C Kull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Bridges
Represented By: Susan L Haire
Represented By: Jeffrey C Kull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?