Tech Blast Inc et al v. Clark et al
| Tech Blast Inc and Visa Tech Inc |
| Lewis Clark, Jr, Ruby K Clark, Aaron Troy Addison and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2016cv02480 |
| July 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Lexington |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
JUDGMENT dismissing claims with prejudice as to defendant Ruby K. Clark and dismissing as to defendant Smith and Smith's counterclaims and dismissing as to defendants Does 1 through 20. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER directing the parties to inform the court in writing of the status of the claims remaining against Defendant Smith on or before December 13, 2017 and advise the court as to whether the case is ready for trial. (Status Report due by 12/13/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 11/29/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
75
AMENDED ORDER adopting the 72 Report and Recommendation and granting Plaintiffs' 67 Motion for Final Judgment. Signed by Honorable J. Michelle Childs on 11/27/2017. (bgoo)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER adopting the 39 Report and Recommendation, granting Plaintiffs' 38 amended motion to dismiss, and dismissing Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Ruby K. Clark with prejudice. Signed by Honorable J. Michelle Childs on 5/16/2017. (bgoo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
